My9s
Follow and join in this discussion by using your free NINES account.

NINES and peer review RSS
An open discussion sponsored by ENG 6806 Digital Editing and Databases. All NINES users can read and comment.
Log in or create an account to participate.

Posted by Dana Wheeles on Apr 04, 2011 02:13PM

NINES was founded in 2004-2005 to serve the needs of scholars who were already experimenting with new technologies in their research. Established scholars were finishing large projects such as the William Blake Archive, the Rossetti Archive and the Walt Whitman Archive, but they found that there were few methods for sharing and advertising their ideas with other scholars online. How could a user know if a site were reputable? How could a scholar get credit for work done in a medium other than print?

Sites that get the NINES stamp of approval are brought together in our Search interface. Want to find the best new work in nineteenth-century studies online? Browse through the peer-reviewed projects to see sites built by scholars and librarians across the world. Or, search by keyword or name, and get results from all kinds of online resources - some of which have freely available content, while others require subscription.

What are some of the issues involved in peer review of online material? What new questions must scholars ask of work done in this medium?

Dana
Creative Commons License This post is protected by a Attribution Non-Commercial Creative Commons License. Learn more here.
Replies to this topic (1)

Posted by jason.hertz on Oct 17, 2011 02:41PM

Hi Dana,

I am interested in the question you raise because I don't quite understand the role editors play at NINES. Do they verify credibility and hyper-text markup? Or do they evaluate strong interpretative arguments? Further, what is the role of NINES contributors? Do they provide credible entries with good mark up? Do they publish arguments?

Best,

Jason