My9s
Creative Commons License
This exhibit has not been peer reviewed.  [Return to Group]  [Printer-friendly Page] 

Lisa is a Mona: Challenging Victorian Gender Assumptions

Melad Abou Al-Ghanam and Denielle Jackson

Ryerson University

Walter Pater and the Mona Lisa

Walter Pater’s The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry@ is a book first published in 1873 by Macmillan & Co. under a slightly varied title: Studies in the History of the Renaissance.@ Pater’s influential book has seen many revisions and reincarnations and continues to circulate libraries worldwide in modern day 21st century. Pater’s writings and contributions to the Fortnightly Review@ served as the precursor to the The Renaissance, a compilation of his essays on art and poetry with chapters dedicated to Sandro Botticelli, Michelangelo, Joachim du Bellay, Winckelmann, as well as Leonardo Da Vinci. Of interest is Pater’s essay on Leonardo Da Vinci, his first submission to the monthly Fortnightly Review. Walter Pater’s critique of the Mona Lisa revived interest in the portrait three centuries later as he saw it as more than just a great piece of art. Therefore, the portrait’s iconic status is no coincidence and is the result of a long thread of commentaries ignited by influential 19th century art critics such as Walter Pater and Theophile Gautier. In his 2001 book, Becoming Mona Lisa: The Making of a Global Icon, Professor Donald Sassoon of University of London, argues that Pater and Gautier were the discoverers of the Mona Lisa.@ However, “of the two, Pater’s influence has proved the greater, as his eloquent passages on the Mona Lisa were themselves of such poetical power that many men committed these words to memory. It was not at all unusual for a man to recite Pater as he gazed at the painting itself.”@
Walter Pater
Walter Pater
"She is older than the rocks among which she sits; like the vampire, she has been dead many times, and learned the secrets of the grave; and has been a diver in deep seas, and keeps their fallen day about her;
and trafficked for strange webs with Eastern merchants, and, as Leda, was the mother of Helen of Troy, and, as Saint Anne, the mother of Mary; and all this has been to her but as the sound of lyres and flutes, and lives only in the delicacy with which it has molded the changing lineaments, and tinged the eyelids and the hands." -Walter Pater
Walter Pater was able to see beyond the macroscopic beauty of the portrait of Lisa Gherardini that the spectator sees at a glance. Pater read the emotions hidden in the microscopic details such as the half-smile and weary eyelids. Pater designated the Mona Lisa as the epitome of eternal femininity. For a painting that took Leonardo Da Vinci an estimated twelve years to complete, one can only expect the Mona Lisa to be host to multiple underlying meanings and interpretations. Da Vinci painted with extraneous attention to detail and precision, concealing meaning behind every thin brush stroke. The Mona Lisa remains clouded with uncertainties until this day with recent speculations disputing the identity of the sitter to be Da Vinci’s personal assistant Salai.
W.B. Yeats
W.B. Yeats used the quote-- controversially-- as the first 'poem' in his 1936 Oxford Book of Modern Verse
However, Pater’s attempt to decipher the portrait and emphasize its emotional impact on the spectator has far-reaching implications on authors that would follow such as Michael Field, Oscar Wilde, as well as Sigmund Freud, the pioneer of psychoanalytic theories. Freud’s 1919 essay on the uncanny stems from Walter Pater’s work and his ability to see the hidden double meaning behind the Mona Lisa’s half-smile, “unfathomable smile, always with a touch of something sinister in it.”@ Furthermore, Pater’s allusion to Da Vinci’s sexual attraction to men attributes the ideal, womanly beauty of the Mona Lisa to Leonardo’s mother hence the “weary eyelids” and “older than the rocks.” The fact that Leonardo Da Vinci was raised by his mother with no fatherly figure in his life to care for him further strengthens the argument that the portrait’s complexity has to do with the personal connection it had to the only ideal woman in Leonardo’s life: his mother. Therefore, Pater’s analysis and interpretation of the Mona Lisa took into account Leonardo’s biography hence the mention of Vasari, the renowned Italian artist biographer. Pater’s work had far-reaching implications that transcended into areas of study such as psychology and psychoanalysis.

Walter Pater can be seen as a pioneer of Queer Theory for challenging hegemonic gender assumptions perpetuated by Victorian society. Through his work, which often exhibited transparent hints of homoerotic desire, Pater legitimized homoeroticism and homosexuality. Renowned British art historian and director of the National Gallery in London, Michael Levey, speculated that Pater "guarded the secret of his own emotional urges, possibly never revealing-even to someone like Simeon Solomon-the intensity of his yearning for the ideal male friend."@ Pater imagined the Mona Lisa to emulate “womanly beauty” and “doubtful sex” at the same time, “Pater aims not at imagining men-who-would-be-womanly in the Renaissance but men-who-would-be-another-kind-of-manly.” Therefore, much of Pater’s reading into the Mona Lisa and other works of art had do with his own personal struggles in the conservative Victorian era, seeing as he was very secluded and spent his entire life living with his two spinster sisters in London.@ Pater’s work still resonates in modern day 21st century, where the fight for the legitimization and acceptance of homosexuality continues. The conclusion to the Renaissance embraces and advocates for a lifestyle of hedonism, which Pater felt Victorian society was not yet ready for. Therefore, the conclusion was retracted from the revised second edition of The Renaissance only to be included in further editions. Following Oscar Wilde's trial, Walter Pater was exhausted from advocating for change through his work in his final years. Pater confessed to one of his undergraduate students, "I feel there are many things which are bound to come, though I do not feel willing to aid them in coming."@

Another factor that adds to the air of mystery surrounding the Mona Lisa is the fact that the painting was relocated from Italy to France, where little was known of Lisa Gherardini. In France, the painting remained in the private collections of the King of France until the opening of the Louvre. Therefore, when Parisians flooded into the Palais du Louvre upon its opening in 1793, they were able to attach mystique qualities to the portrait of a woman with little known history in France. The Mona Lisa’s half smile was seen as a window behind which she hid plenty of secrets. In his article Walter Pater's "Renaissance" and Leonardo Da Vinci's Reputation in the Nineteenth Century, Barrie Bullen even argues that much of Pater’s ideas and criticism of Da Vinci were borrowed from different French critics such as Michelet and Gautier. However, “what is perhaps puzzling is that Pater's essay has become widely known and read whereas those of his French contemporaries have been largely forgotten.” It is even argued that had Pater not republished his essays from the Fortnightly Review into a book, his interpretation of the Mona Lisa along with his other works, would have eventually suffered the same fate.